I am thrilled to have discovered the concept of Open Educational Resources (OER), especially since I recently approached my Associate Dean with a request to discontinue the use of a particular textbook. I found out that the textbook costs $180, yet I only reference it occasionally, and its readings can be quite confusing.
My course, Human Relations, focuses on communication and self-awareness to foster healthy relationships. Given the nature of this course, I believe more flexible resources are essential to adapt to the unique dynamics of each class. For instance, one year my class was highly engaging and extroverted, while another year the students were more reserved and hesitant to speak aloud. I needed to tailor my teaching approach to suit these different groups, which the rigid structure of the textbook couldn’t accommodate.
Another significant concern is the cost of the textbook. This course often attracts students from single-parent households, low-income families, and young adults, for whom the high price of the textbook is prohibitive, especially when it isn’t central to their learning. This financial burden is unfair, particularly when the same content can be accessed through more affordable or even free resources. Embracing OER would not only alleviate this burden but also provide the flexibility to better meet the needs of diverse student groups.
Hi Hannah,
I think there’s lots of untapped potential for the integration of open textbooks. Within traditional undergrad disciplines I’ve found the greatest force behind the adoption of open textbooks has been lobbying from students. BCcampus has had a push to support the development of, and then publicize ‘Zed Cred’ programs, which have no additional costs for readings or course materials.
Often a barrier can be the difference between existing OER and the needs of a course or program. If you can get other instructors that teach a course to join in revising or creating content to bridge the gap, the task can become more manageable.