Hannah Winsnes Portfolio

Let's Talk - Learning, Discussing, and Growing together

EDDL 5131 – UDL

     I am an educator who firmly believes in and supports the use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in the classroom. One example of its implementation was in my Grade 7 in-person language arts class, which included 26 students with diverse learning needs. Among my students were individuals with visual impairments, various learning disabilities, and behavioral disorders. Given this complexity, it was crucial to intentionally design my classroom using UDL principles to enhance student engagement and learning.

     Key elements included offering students a choice in testing options, such as audio tests or oral responses instead of written ones. Additionally, I created different learning centers to cater to various preferences, including a quiet corner, a discussion area, a helper station, and a teacher station. I also integrated technology, providing access to digital tools like text-to-speech software and interactive reading apps to support different learning styles.

     To further support diverse learners, I incorporated multimedia resources, such as videos with closed captions and interactive storytelling tools, which helped make content more accessible. For my higher achieving students, I used technology to act as an editor as they worked independently on writing short stories for publication. In addition, I did not have a seating plan thus allowing students to choose where they felt most comfortable and promoting choice, and responsibility,  in their learning. Collaborative group work was encouraged, with roles assigned based on individual strengths, fostering peer support and engagement.

     Regular check-ins and formative assessments helped me tailor instruction to meet individual needs, while goal-setting activities empowered students to take ownership of their learning. By embracing UDL, I created a more inclusive and supportive learning environment, ensuring that every student had the opportunity to succeed and thrive.

 

EDDL 5131 – Measuring Accountability

My institution uses Blackboard as its LMS, which facilitates online education by centralizing course management, content delivery, communication, and assessment. Instructors can manage course materials, assignments, and feedback, while students gain easy access to resources, submissions, grades, and communication. Its integrated tools streamline teaching and learning, making it valuable for both in-person and online courses. However, the key question remains whether it meets accessibility guidelines.

  • Navigation is generally user-friendly, with keyboard navigation allowing users who cannot use a mouse to navigate easily, and information presented in a logical format. However, the extensive menu structure can make accessing course content time-consuming.
  • Content Structure benefits from consistent use of headings, titles, and lists across courses, with a uniform menu layout. The downside is the variability in how instructors organize content, which can confuse students navigating different courses.
  • Hyperlinks are clearly indicated by the universally recognized blue color, but the inconsistency in naming and usage, depending on the instructor, can hinder readability and usability.
  • Text is made accessible through the option for instructors to add alternative text to images and use color to highlight important information. However, this feature is underutilized, and the heavy reliance on text without frequent use of images can overwhelm students.
  • Images can be added to enhance content, but the process is not intuitive, leading most instructors to rely primarily on text, which reduces visual engagement.
  • Documents are supported in accessible formats, like PDFs and Word files, yet the effectiveness depends heavily on the instructor’s ability to upload materials correctly, which can lead to accessibility issues.
  • Multimedia capabilities include closed captions for videos and integration with YouTube, aiding users with hearing impairments. However, the incorporation of multimedia is highly dependent on individual instructors’ preferences.
  • Adaptability allows users to adjust color settings and use high-contrast modes for better visibility, but the process is not user-friendly, making it challenging for students to implement these adjustments.

Overall, while Blackboard provides a range of tools and features that enhance accessibility and usability, the effectiveness is often contingent on individual instructor implementation, which can lead to inconsistencies and potential accessibility challenges.

EDDL 5131 – OER Scavenger Hunt

Resource 1 – Professional Communication E-Textbook

The aim of this OER is for the student to develop the knowledge and skills necessary to:

  1. competently communicate in both a personally effective and socially appropriate manner within culturally diverse workplace settings, and
  2. value interpersonal communication as integral to creating and fostering relationships.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LWwTBfTAFPcFIq2c5DrXONUriddWwY-YBHwepCgLvAU/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.yk8qpgys2exf 

Rating – I would give this a 5 out of 5 star for being a close match to my objective

Quality – the text is in easy to read format and vocabulary is accessible for a variety of learners. There is no cost for this text and it has been created in Alberta which is the province it will be applied in for my course. The resource is of high quality of information for the content in the course I would be teaching with the following objectives:

  • Utilize interpersonal communication skills to increase effective personal and professional relationships.
  • Practice diverse communication skills to increase sensitivity and competency in a variety of social and cultural interactions.

Usage – I would use this text as is as there is no need to adapt it. 

 

Resource 2 – Principles of Social Psychology

The aim of this OER is based on a critical thinking approach—its aim is to get students thinking actively and conceptually. To help students better grasp the big picture of social psychology and to provide you with a theme the text has a consistent pedagogy across the chapters. It is organized around two underlying principles that are essential to social psychology:

  1. Person and situation (the classic treatment)
  2. The ABCs of social psychology (affect, behavior, and cognition)

Discussion is framed around the two human motivations of self-concern and other-concern. Discussions focus on a variety of dimensions including altruism, aggression, prejudice, gender differences, and cultural differences. 

https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/front-matter/accessibility-statement/

Rating – I would give this a 5 out of 5 star for being a close match to my objective

Quality – the text is in easy to read format and vocabulary is accessible for a variety of learners. There is no cost for this text and it has been created in Alberta which is the province it will be applied in for my course. The resource is of high quality of information for the content in the course I would be teaching with the following objectives:

  • Examine psychological and social influences on human behavior to objectively analyze one’s own interpersonal experiences and relationships.

Usage – I would adapt this resource to only focus on a few chapters and not complete the full text.

EDDL 5131 – OER

I am thrilled to have discovered the concept of Open Educational Resources (OER), especially since I recently approached my Associate Dean with a request to discontinue the use of a particular textbook. I found out that the textbook costs $180, yet I only reference it occasionally, and its readings can be quite confusing.

My course, Human Relations, focuses on communication and self-awareness to foster healthy relationships. Given the nature of this course, I believe more flexible resources are essential to adapt to the unique dynamics of each class. For instance, one year my class was highly engaging and extroverted, while another year the students were more reserved and hesitant to speak aloud. I needed to tailor my teaching approach to suit these different groups, which the rigid structure of the textbook couldn’t accommodate.

Another significant concern is the cost of the textbook. This course often attracts students from single-parent households, low-income families, and young adults, for whom the high price of the textbook is prohibitive, especially when it isn’t central to their learning. This financial burden is unfair, particularly when the same content can be accessed through more affordable or even free resources. Embracing OER would not only alleviate this burden but also provide the flexibility to better meet the needs of diverse student groups.

EDDL 5131 – Reconcili-Action at RDP

Reconcili-Action Plan at RDP

When I explored my institution to understand how it is engaging with local Indigenous peoples, I discovered that RDP has implemented a Reconcili-Action Plan for 2023-2028. This plan was developed by the RDP Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Indigenization (EDII) Indigenous Working Group in consultation with Indigenous stakeholders, including RDP Indigenous students, the Red Deer Native Friendship Society, Sunchild First Nation, Montana First Nation, Ermineskin First Nation, Big Horn 144A Reserve, Shining Mountains Community Living Services, Urban Aboriginal Voices Society, and Métis Local 492. The plan outlines several actions to support reconciliation, such as relationship building, accessible education, Two-Eyed Seeing, and encouraging open voices. The policies in this plan are essential for positioning RDP as a partner alongside Indigenous peoples in central Alberta.

Indigenous Student Services and Events

In addition to the Reconcili-Action Plan, I discovered that our institution has an Indigenous Student Services department dedicated to supporting Indigenous students’ academic success. This department provides resources and guidance to help Indigenous students thrive and integrate into the institutional environment. The institution also hosts several Indigenous-focused events, such as an annual Indigenous conference organized by students and community members, an Indigenous culture camp, and activities leading up to National Truth and Reconciliation Day.

Gaps in Policies for Instructors

Despite these initiatives, there is a noticeable gap in policies guiding instructors on integrating Indigenous content, activities, or pedagogy into their teaching. While programs like the Bachelor of Education, Early Learning, Social Work, and Educational Assistant programs include policies and courses focused on Indigenous pedagogy—aligned with Alberta’s Teacher Quality Standard #5, which emphasizes foundational knowledge about First Nations, Métis, and Inuit for the benefit of all students—these resources are often not widely visible or accessible to post-secondary instructors, as they are primarily designed for K-12 educators.

Implications for Other Departments

This raises questions about other departments, such as Trades, Arts, Math, and Science. Are these areas incorporating Indigenous pedagogy? If the institution does not mandate these concepts across all departments, how can genuine reconciliation be achieved?

Alignment with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

This oversight could be seen as a failure to align with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action. Ensuring all departments engage with Indigenous pedagogy is crucial for meaningful progress toward reconciliation.

EDDL 5141 Week 12 – Final Blog: Top 8 Takeaways

I want to express my gratitude for such an enriching course experience. Throughout it, I’ve gained valuable insights and acquired a plethora of strategies to integrate into my future online classrooms. I have prepared a short video (6 minutes) that outline my top 8 takeaways. Throughout the duration of the course, I have been continuously inspired and motivated by the valuable insights shared and the engaging discussions that ensued. Each interaction has contributed significantly to my professional growth and development.

EDDL 5141 Week 9: Creating Community

This marks my eighth master’s of education course at Thompson Rivers University, and it’s the first time I’ve been part of a group setting. All my previous courses were solitary pursuits, self-paced and discussion-based, but also distinctly impersonal. I hardly knew my instructors, and reaching out to them for help felt like an imposition. Similarly, my classmates were mere screen names on a discussion board, distant and unfamiliar. I attributed this to my choice of format, realizing later that I had underestimated the value of connecting with peers in an online format. That changed with this class. Here, I’ve not only felt supported by my instructor but also formed genuine bonds with my classmates. Emma, Debra, and I gather weekly on Teams, not just to discuss assignments but to share snippets of our lives – from daily happenings to stories about our pets and vacations. It’s all too easy to overlook the human aspect of online learning, forgetting that there are real people on the other side of the screen and I am glad this class has shown me how valuable it can be.

I used to believe that creating the classroom atmosphere was solely the instructor’s responsibility. However, in Vesely et al.’s (2012) article, they emphasize that both the instructor and the students play a crucial role in fostering a learning community. The more I reflected on this, the more I realized its validity, as learning is a collaborative process. It is true that as the leader, the instructor “must encourage supportive, interactive processes where class members can get to know each other, develop social skills with one another, and accept and support each other” (Vesely et al., 2012, p.234). However, the students have just as significant a role in participating, engaging, and reaching out to each other.

How can a collaborative community be nurtured? According to a video from the University of Saskatchewan, fostering student interactions, including commenting on each other’s work, sharing emotions, and discussing areas of understanding and confusion, can mimic a traditional classroom environment (University of Saskatchewan, 2012, 1:10). Parker and Herrington (2015) provide a comprehensive table on page 2 outlining various strategies for building rapport and encouraging emotional expression. What struck me about this table was its focus on instructors. Shouldn’t students also be involved? Why not introduce these strategies to students at the outset of the course or incorporate weekly exercises aimed at developing rapport and emotional expression? Often, educators hoard valuable insights, hoping to single-handedly mold a community. What if we shared this knowledge with our students and collaborated with them transparently? Transitioning from solo efforts to collaborative endeavors is key to fostering a robust, impactful, secure, and engaging community, whether in virtual or physical spaces.

References

Parker, J., & Herrington, J. (2015). Setting the climate in an authentic online community of learning. Australia Association for Research in Education Conference , 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.aare.edu.au/data/2015_Conference/Full_papers/140_Jenni_Parker.pdf

University of Saskatchewan. (2012). Maintaining community in online courses [Video file]. Source: https://youtu.be/byCIa1Rw7tg CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CA

Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 234-246. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/vesely.pdf

EDDL 5141 Week 7: Comparing Models

Topic The Five Stage Model v the COI Framework
Similarities
  • Both frameworks have been developed to enhance the online learning environment. 
  • The models both break up learning into steps or elements.
  • There is a focus on collaboration in both models 
  • Both models involve the learning theory of constructivism
Differences Purpose

The Five Stage Model focuses on the process of online learning, specifically in terms of how learners engage. It progresses through five different stages of development: Access and Motivation, Online Socialization, Information Exchange, Knowledge Construction, and Development.

The COI framework is centered around the notion of a “community of inquiry,” emphasizing the importance of social, cognitive, and teaching presence in online learning environments. It identifies three presences: social presence (interpersonal interaction and communication), cognitive presence (the process of constructing meaning and knowledge), and teaching presence (the design, facilitation, and direction of the educational experience).

Learning

The Five Stage Model offers a structured approach to designing and facilitating online learning experiences (Salmon, 2006, p. 39). Educators can use this model to plan and scaffold activities that support learners at each stage of development, ensuring a smooth progression toward deeper understanding and engagement.

The COI Framework: Provides a framework for understanding and assessing the quality of online learning experiences (Garrison, 2007, p. 61). Educators can use this framework to evaluate the degree to which social, cognitive, and teaching presences are present and effectively integrated within their courses, guiding improvements in course design and facilitation.

Additional strategy to apply to my practice Regarding stage 1 (Access and Motivation) (Salmon, G. 2006, p. 40), I would employ a strategy to have screencasting videos showing students how to access and use technology. New technologies can be very stressful to try and figure out on your own, and the stress of academics will compound your emotional response. It is essential to support the students through their technological journey to succeed in their academic journey. As such, adding quick videos of how to use the technology can be invaluable. 

 

References

 

Garrison, D. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: social, cognitive, and teaching 

presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11 (1), 61-72. Retrieved 

from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ842688.pdf

 

Salmon, G. (2006). 80:20 for e-moderators. In: The challenge of ecompetence in academic staff 

development . CELT, NUI Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland, pp. 145-154. Retrieved 

from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/18862/2/Salmon_Ch16_2006_PV.pdf

EDDL 5141 Week 6: Draft Course Design

Educational context: 

The online course I am developing is called The Role of the EA. This course focuses on clarifying roles and responsibilities between teachers and educational assistants. Topics include understanding the code of conduct, job descriptions, tasks, Alberta Teachers Association expectations and policies, and how to contribute to a positive school environment. 

Description of Online and Teaching and Learning Experience: 

The online course consists of two-hour weekly live synchronous sessions spanning six weeks. Its primary objective is to thoroughly explore the course material, present case scenarios derived from the information, and facilitate group discussions and debriefings to ensure a comprehensive understanding among students. Recordings of all live sessions will be available for those unable to attend due to conflicting commitments. Furthermore, students are encouraged to review the material in advance, submitting questions before each live class. This proactive approach allows the class to address their inquiries even if they are unable to participate in real-time.

Situational Factors

After a review of the situational factors for this course (Fink, 2003, p. 6), the predominant demographic of students in this program is composed mainly of females aged 18-40, with a significant portion being single parents or young mothers. A considerable number of enrollees in the educational assistant program have faced challenges in their own educational paths, fostering a deep appreciation for individuals committed to positively impacting the lives of young children. Prospective instructors are required to hold a minimum of a bachelor’s degree and have accumulated 5-10 years of classroom experience.

Outcomes Learning Activities Assessment
Outcome #1: By tBy the end of the term, educational assistants (EAs) will apply their knowledge of professional and ethical practices outlined in the Code of Ethics to create a personal code of conduct.

Outcome #2: By the end of the spring term, the educational assistant (EA) will review key roles and responsibilities of educational assistants that differ from those of teachers in the Alberta K-12 education system.

Code of Conduct: 

  • Provide case studies that highlight ethical dilemmas in educational settings. Use student blogs (UNSW, n.d.) to facilitate conversations about ethical considerations in different scenarios.
  • Have students engage in active learning (Fink, 2003, p. 16) by forming small breakout groups and assign students parts of the Code of Conduct for educational assistants in Alberta to analyze and discuss specific aspects of the Code of Ethics.
  • Students will need to complete a personal code of conduct as such the course will incorporate peer review sessions where participants exchange and provide constructive feedback on each other’s draft using Blogs and discussion forums (UNSW, n.d).

Role of the Educational Assistant

  • Have participants create comparison Venn diagrams illustrating the distinctions between the roles of educational assistants and teachers.
  • Host an interactive class on Class Collaborate (UNSW, n.d.) where experts in the field, including both educational assistants and teachers, discuss their roles and responsibilities. Allow participants to ask questions and engage in discussions. 
Code of Conduct

  • Educational assistants will develop a personal code of conduct to apply their understanding of ethical practices required in their professional roles.

Role of the Educational Assistant

  • Educational assistants will engage in an online quiz focused on the distinctions in roles and responsibilities between educational assistants (EAs) and teachers. This quiz will feature scenarios and comparisons, allowing participants to demonstrate their comprehension of the unique aspects that differentiate each role.
Integration
  • Alignment: I started planning with a backward design model with asking myself these three questions “What do I want students to know? How will I know that they have learned it? What activities/tools will the students need to show their understanding?” (Center for teaching and learning, 2024). This process allowed me to start with the goal and not get lost in creating activities to ensure there are purposeful learning opportunities in the unit as well as strong assessment that matches the learning. 
  • Learning Objectives: I wrote the learning objectives in student centered language, narrowed the objective down to focus on one skill, and incorporated action verbs which were measurable (Carnegie Mellon University, 2016). 

 

References

Carnegie Mellon University. (2016). Articulate your learning objectives. Retrieved from https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/learningobjectives.html

 

Center for teaching and learning. (2024). Backwards course design. https://teaching.uwo.ca/curriculum/coursedesign/backward-design.html 

 

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. Retrieved from 

http://www.deefinkandassociates.com/ GuidetoCourseDesignAug05.pdf

UNSW. (n.d.). Selecting technologies. Retrieved from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/selecting-technologies

EDDL 5141 Week 5: Situational Factors in Course Design

In week 5, the questions about planning for situational factors are pivotal to exploring the unique dynamics of the virtual learning environment, diverse student profiles, and the subject matter. Initially, this intentional approach prompted me to assess my technological proficiency and awareness of available tools for an online platform. While this is essential to ensure a robust online learning experience, it did not constitute the most impactful aspect of my learning from this activity.

As I continued deliberately reflecting, a significant aspect emerged: the recognition of my students. While I was aware of their rich life experiences, which contribute as valuable resources in the learning process, I had not thoroughly considered their purpose for being there. Unlike children mandated to attend school, these students have chosen their career paths, often balancing full-time work and family responsibilities. Their commitment to working with vulnerable students reflects their compassion, empathy, patience, and resilience. Those drawn to this profession are inherently motivated to positively impact the lives of vulnerable students, viewing their work as a meaningful contribution to a student’s education and quality of life.

This newfound understanding of my students reinforces the importance of what I teach. It compels me to respect their limited time due to other obligations, provide technology for engagement, and, most importantly, recognize who they are and why they chose this career path. Their choice is an intentional act of service, and keeping this forefront in my perspective is essential to cultivating an online learning environment that serves as a role model for my students.

 

« Older posts